Comparable registered-sale evidence
Source, transaction basis, relevance, and review notes
Valuation workflow
Build a valuation case
Organise source-labelled comparable evidence, indicative AVM and DLS GV context, assumptions, and unresolved gaps into a case that remains ready for qualified professional review.
Evidence enters a case. Automation stops before judgement.
The review desk files each input into its own labelled lane. Nothing here is mechanically averaged, and no automated Market Value conclusion is produced.
Review switchboard
One case file · four distinct lanes
Source type, context, assumptions, and missingness remain visible throughout.
Evidence inbox
DLS General Valuation context
DLS general-valuation context, with its own date and basis
Indicative AVM / model context
Model output identified separately from observed evidence
Assumptions & unresolved gaps
Questions, limitations, missing evidence, and special assumptions
Reviewable valuation case
Evidence file · layers kept separate
Comparable evidence
Observed evidence kept source-labelled and reviewable
DLS GV context
Context only — not Market Value or sale price
Indicative model context
Not Market Value and not a certified RICS valuation
Assumptions & gaps
Visible review items — never silent defaults
No automated value conclusion
The case is organised for review; it is not a Market Value or certified RICS valuation.
Professional boundary
Professional boundary
Flagship workflow
A reviewable case, not an automated value conclusion
Bring the evidence and reasoning into one file while keeping model output, official context, assumptions, and professional judgement distinct.
Build a reviewable valuation case
Connect the subject property, reviewed evidence, working assumptions, and unresolved items so a qualified professional can assess the case.
- Evidence retains source and review context
- Assumptions and gaps stay explicit
- Professional judgement remains with the qualified valuer
Three supporting jobs
Review comparable evidence
Assess source-labelled observations, transaction basis, relevance, and adjustment notes before deciding what supports the case.
Review comparable supportUse indicative AVM and DLS GV context
Treat indicative AVM as model context, not a certified RICS valuation, and DLS GV as official context, not Market Value or sale price.
Review valuation boundariesHandoff assumptions, gaps, and reports
Keep assumptions, special questions, missing evidence, and draft-output status visible for qualified professional review.
Review report workflowEvidence Boundary
Valuation support does not replace a valuation
Emvadon structures evidence and working context; it does not supply the qualified professional opinion.
Official source
Formally registered sale observations, parcel records, source dates, and DLS GV context remain distinct evidence families where available. DLS GV is not Market Value, sale price, comparable evidence, or a RICS valuation.
Emvadon interpretation
Emvadon supports comparable review, indicative AVM context, assumptions, gaps, and draft workflow organisation. An indicative AVM is not a certified RICS valuation.
Professional confirmation required
The qualified professional remains responsible for evidence selection, adjustments, valuation date, basis of value, assumptions, methodology, signed opinion, and reliance.
Unavailable / unresolved
Evidence can be partial, unavailable, differently dated, or unsuitable for the assignment. Missing evidence is not proof of absence and must remain visible in the case.